What'll be free next?

Publication date: 2 May 2010
Originally published 2009 in Atomic: Maximum Power Computing
Last modified 03-Dec-2011.

 

Before digital audio existed, there were plenty of musicians who wanted to give their music away for free. But there was no way for them to distribute it, without paying for duplication.

Now, it's easy for anybody with Internet access to grab a copy of arbitrary digital data from random Net-connected people on the other side of the planet. So not only can musicians who want to give their music away do so easily, but P2P users, egged on by filthy subversives, have decided to share vast amounts of other stuff, whether or not it's legal to do so.

Even if you ignore the petabytes of copyright infringement, there's still an astounding amount of free-to-download content on the Net now. To a significant extent, for instance, music really has become free.

There are free books, too. The overwhelming majority of them are old works whose copyright has expired and whose authors are long dead. Living authors tend to guard their work ferociously, or are signed up with publishing companies that do the guarding for them. But there are more and more current writers - I think, quite often, the better writers - who love the idea of being their own little digital lending library. Publishing companies are even starting to get in on the act.

(I'm not even counting the impressive array of crackpots who're delighted that BitTorrent allows them to self-publish their conspiracy theories and manifestoes for free.)

This leaves me wondering what's going to become free next.

I think it'll be movies.

On the face of it, this sounds ludicrous. Movies, after all, need actors and directors and sound people and camera people and focus pullers and grips and Best Boys and caterers and Assistants to Mister Impossible-To-Work-With Actor and drivers and animal wranglers and publicists and colorists and gaffers and set-builders and set dressers and hairstylists and makeup artists and continuity people and god in heaven it goes on and on and on.

So even a small-budget movie has a pretty darn high budget. And, unless you're a billionaire playboy making movies for fun, you have to make that budget back. Plus a bit extra, or you may have some trouble finding backers for your next project.

Result: No free movies. (Well, no legal free movies.)

But this is all because there isn't, yet, such a thing as a bedroom movie studio. The closest we've come is "machinima", which is essentially a puppet-show.

If you wanted to produce a record in 1980, you needed expensive equipment, a special studio building, many functionaries and hangers-on - oh, and musicians, too. But now, never mind mere pop music - one person can now create whole real-sounding orchestral works on their computer. On their laptop computer, for that matter.

Live-action movies are still restricted by the same sorts of things that impeded music production a few decades ago. Digital effects and Pixar-grade 3D animation are getting better and better, but you still need a ton of processing power to do them. And if your movie is live-action, you need actors who can actually act, on top of all the support personnel.

A single creator can already make a whole animated movie. Some determined souls even did it before computer technology made it possible to make more than a second of footage per day, and now one person can make a full-length animated film like Sita Sings the Blues (downloads here and here).

It took Nina Paley years to make Sita (and she didn't do absolutely everything herself, not being quite up to voicing all of the characters, for instance, and using a lot of public-domain or freely-licensed music). But that was partly because she built it up in stages, starting with a short and ending with an 82-minute film. It would have taken much, much, much longer without computer assistance (Sita was largely made in Adobe Flash).

For live-action, though, a single creator is, at the moment, still going to have a very hard time if they want to make more than a tiny little short film.

I think inexpensive computers will, not terribly many years from now, bring to moviemaking what they've already brought to audio production. You'll be able to make a movie with a cast of thousands on a PC, designing virtual actors with City-of-Heroes/Spore-like interfaces, animating them with as much or as little direct control of every twitch and quiver as you like, and setting up appearance and movement mutators if you need to create crowds.

I wouldn't even be surprised if realistic close-up facial movement will be possible without motion-capture or puppetry, or if synthesised voices take over from voice talent. We've already got software that sings, after all.

You'll even be able to set your movies in famous places, provided there isn't some Eiffel-Tower-like copy-control nonsense about all images of said place being the property of some entity.

Microsoft's remarkable Photosynth can already stitch a bunch of photos into a 3D representation of a scene or object. Apply the same tech to freely-licensed tourist photos of a location, and presto, there's your location.

You would still need to spackle over the fuzzy bits by hand. Or just never point the camera at them - the same technique that used to be used to keep TV aerials and passing Boeings out of historical epics. There's no clear line between "hiding fuzzy bits" and "manually building the whole location", by the way; "virtual backlot" technology, to seamlessly replace expensive location shots with studio greenscreen work, is already becoming commonplace in TV shows.

Thanks to desktop match-moving software, there's also now a whole genre of low-budget short films that're constructed from an inexpensive camcorder location shoot, plus a heavy coating of CGI, with fantastic results.

(After this page went up, a reader also pointed me to another excellent example of this genre, six-minute short "The Raven", yours in HD for free here.)

So one way or another, realistic locations will be available in the bedroom film studio soon enough.

At the moment, it's still impossible for a proper movie - even a short one - to be a complete labour of love, unless everybody involved is able to take time off work and still be able to pay the rent. Even little student-film sorts of things are major undertakings, by the standards of ordinary human hobbyists. Which is why fan-film instalments that were originally meant to be released on a monthly schedule can actually end up with more than three years between Chapters 1 and 2.

(And after all that effort, a cat that jumps in boxes will still get more clicks.)

Film-making is more complicated than music-making, so it's taking off slower. It really isn't practical, yet, for home hobbyists to turn out anything resembling a "real", people-pay-to-see-it movie.

But it won't stay that way.

Will computerisation of movies make live actors obsolete? Well, movies and TV haven't made theatre obsolete, so I doubt it. I think it'll be more like the situation with drum machines.

When programmable drum machines first became available, people wailed (and some other people cheered) about how they'd make a whole class of musician obsolete. But now drum machines have become a perfectly valid instrument in their own right.

Hurry up, home-movie-studio developers.

I can't be the only one who feels a burning need to give Battlestar Galactica a better ending.

Other columns

Learning to love depreciation

Overclockers: Get in early!

Stuff I Hate

Why Macs annoy me

USB: It's worth what you pay

"Great product! Doesn't work!"

The virus I want to see

Lies, damned lies and marketing

Unconventional wisdom

How not to e-mail me

Dan's Quick Guide to Memory Effect, You Idiots

Your computer is not alive

What's the point of robot pets?

Learning from spam

Why it doesn't matter whether censorware works

The price of power

The CPU Cooler Snap Judgement Guide

Avoiding electrocution

Video memory mysteries

New ways to be wrong

Clearing the VR hurdles

Not So Super

Do you have a license for that Athlon?

Cool bananas

Getting rid of the disks

LCDs, CRTs, and geese

Filling up the laptop

IMAX computing

Digital couch potatoes, arise!

Invisible miracles

Those darn wires

Wossit cost, then?

PFC decoded

Cheap high-res TV: Forget it.

V-Pr0n

Dan Squints At The Future, Again

The programmable matter revolution

Sounding better

Reality Plus™!

I want my Tidy-Bot!

Less go, more show

In search of stupidity

It's SnitchCam time!

Power struggle

Speakers versus headphones

Getting paid to play

Hurdles on the upgrade path

Hatin' on lithium ion

Wanted: Cheap giant bit barrel

The screen you'll be using tomorrow

Cool gadget. Ten bucks.

Open Sesame!

Absolutely accurate predictions

The truth about everything

Burr walnut computing

Nothing new behind the lens

Do it yourself. Almost.

The quest for physicality

Tool time

Pretty PCs - the quest continues

The USB drive time bomb

Closer to quietness

Stuff You Should Want

The modular car

Dumb smart houses

Enough already with the megapixels

Inching toward the NAS of our dreams

Older than dirt

The Synthetics are coming

Pr0nBack!

Game Over is nigh

The Embarrassingly Easy Case Mod

Dumb then, smart now

Fuel cells - are we there yet?

A PC full of magnets

Knowledge is weakness

One Laptop Per Me

The Land of Wind, Ghosts and Minimised Windows

Things that change, things that don't

Water power

Great interface disasters

Doughnut-shaped universes

Grease and hard drive change

Save me!

Impossible antenna, only $50!

I'm ready for my upgrade

The Great Apathetic Revolution

Protect the Wi-Fi wilderness!

Wi-Fi pirate radio

The benign botnet

Meet the new DRM, same as the old DRM

Your laptop is lying to you

Welcome to super-surveillance

Lemon-fresh power supplies

A>B>C>A!

Internet washing machines, and magic rip-off boxes

GPGPU and the Law of New Features

Are you going to believe me, or your lying eyes?

We're all prisoners of game theory

I think I'm turning cyborg-ese, I really think so

Half an ounce of electrons

Next stop, clay tablets

A bold new computer metaphor

Won't someone PLEASE think of the hard drives?!

Alternate history

From aerial torpedoes to RoboCars

How fast is a hard drive? How long is a piece of string?

"In tonight's episode of Fallout 4..."

How hot is too hot?

Nerd Skill Number One

What'll be free next?

Out: Hot rods. In: Robots.

500 gig per second, if we don't get a flat

No spaceship? No sale.

The shifting goalposts of AI

Steal This Education

Next stop: Hardware piracy

A hundred years of EULAs

The triumph of niceness

The daily grind

Speed kings

Alt-tCRASH

Game crazy

Five trillion bits flying in loose formation

Cannibalise the corpses!

One-note NPCs

Big Brother is watching you play

Have you wasted enough time today?

The newt hits! You die...

Stuck in the foothills

A modest censorship proposal

In Praise of the Fisheye

Filenames.WTF

The death of the manual

Of magic lanterns, and MMORPGs

When you have eliminated the impossible...

Welcome to dream-land

Welcome to my museum

Stomp, don't sprint!

Grinding myself down

Pathfinding to everywhere

A deadly mouse trap

If it looks random, it probably isn't

Identical voices and phantom swords

Boing!

Socialised entertainment

Warfare. Aliens. Car crashes. ENTERTAINMENT!

On the h4xx0ring of p4sswordZ

Seeing past the normal

Science versus SoftRAM

Righteous bits

Random... ish... numbers

I get letters

Money for nothing



Give Dan some money!
(and no-one gets hurt)